Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Wire an internal or admin screen from the existing template

Repetitive feature work|The work pauses once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, and the run continues from there.

An internal screen built from the existing template so operators stop asking somebody to run a query.

The ticket

Build an internal screen from the existing admin template.

Acceptance criteria

  • The screen is built from the existing template and components
  • Access is restricted and each role has a permission test
  • Destructive actions require confirmation
  • A screenshot is attached

What lands as proof

A permission test per role plus a screenshot, so both the access rules and the result are visible.

Why teams defer it

  • Internal tools have no external customer, so they lose every prioritisation round.
  • The manual workaround works, which is exactly why it survives for years.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: build an internal screen from the existing admin template. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means screenshot plus the permission test for each role, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
The run stops once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, which is the cheapest moment to redirect the work.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.