Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Localize one route into a new locale from the existing keys

Repetitive feature work|Everything this ticket has to prove is checked by machine, so it can be handed over as it is. A person still reads the pull request and decides whether to merge it.

A route localised from the keys that already exist, with a rendered capture as the check.

The ticket

Localize one route into a new locale using the existing translation keys.

Acceptance criteria

  • Every string on the route resolves from a key
  • The extraction report shows no untranslated literals
  • The route is captured rendered in the new locale
  • Text expansion does not break the layout

What lands as proof

A capture in the target locale, which is the only way to catch strings that expanded past their container.

Why teams defer it

  • Translation arrives from outside the team on its own schedule, so the work is never fully in your control.
  • Layout breaks from longer text are only visible once somebody actually renders it.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: localize one route into a new locale using the existing translation keys. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means extraction report and a rendered capture of the route, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
None is required before the run starts. Every claim this ticket makes can be checked by machine, so the agent works straight through and a person reviews the finished pull request like any other.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.