Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Remove commented-out code left behind by old changes

Dead code and stale content|Everything this ticket has to prove is checked by machine, so it can be handed over as it is. A person still reads the pull request and decides whether to merge it.

Blocks of code kept in comments just in case, removed because the history already keeps them.

The ticket

Delete commented-out code blocks, relying on version history to preserve them.

Acceptance criteria

  • Commented-out code blocks are removed
  • Explanatory comments are kept and left untouched
  • No behaviour changes
  • Anything genuinely worth keeping is moved into a comment that explains why

What lands as proof

A diff containing only deletions of dead blocks, with real comments untouched.

Why teams defer it

  • It feels like deleting somebody's safety net, even though the history is the actual safety net.
  • Telling a commented-out block from a deliberately documented example needs reading rather than a pattern match.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: delete commented-out code blocks, relying on version history to preserve them. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means only live code remains, the history keeps the rest, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
None is required before the run starts. Every claim this ticket makes can be checked by machine, so the agent works straight through and a person reviews the finished pull request like any other.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.