Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Delete unreachable code the coverage report and call graph confirm

Dead code and stale content|Everything this ticket has to prove is checked by machine, so it can be handed over as it is. A person still reads the pull request and decides whether to merge it.

Code both tools agree nothing can reach, removed with the build output measured either side.

The ticket

Remove code that coverage and the call graph both confirm is unreachable.

Acceptance criteria

  • Both sources of evidence are attached
  • The suite passes
  • Output size is recorded before and after
  • Reflection and configuration-driven access are checked separately

What lands as proof

Two independent tools agreeing, plus a smaller build artefact.

Why teams defer it

  • Neither tool is complete on its own, so the evidence always needs a human pass.
  • Nothing breaks by leaving it, which is why it has survived this long.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: remove code that coverage and the call graph both confirm is unreachable. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means suite green, build output measurably smaller, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
None is required before the run starts. Every claim this ticket makes can be checked by machine, so the agent works straight through and a person reviews the finished pull request like any other.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.