Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Build the missing empty, loading, and error states for one screen

Design system and UI|Everything this ticket has to prove is checked by machine, so it can be handed over as it is. A person still reads the pull request and decides whether to merge it.

A screen designed only for the case where everything works, given the states users meet first.

The ticket

Build the empty, loading, and error states for one screen.

Acceptance criteria

  • Each state is implemented and reachable
  • A screenshot of each is attached
  • The empty state says what to do next rather than only that there is nothing
  • Errors explain what went wrong and offer a way forward

What lands as proof

A screenshot per state, which is also the first time anybody has seen them rendered.

Why teams defer it

  • The design file usually shows one populated state, so the others were never specified.
  • They are hard to reach by hand during development, which is why they ship unfinished.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: build the empty, loading, and error states for one screen. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means a screenshot of each state attached to the pull request, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
None is required before the run starts. Every claim this ticket makes can be checked by machine, so the agent works straight through and a person reviews the finished pull request like any other.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.